‘Bargaining for the common good’ could come back to haunt the unions in Janus v. AFSCME

By Larry Sand
02/27/2018
“Bargaining for the common good,” which greatly expanded the parameters of collective bargaining, was cooked up in 2014 by leaders from public sector unions and community organizations at a national conference held at Georgetown University. The meeting’s priorities included using “the bargaining process as a way to challenge the relationships between government and the private-sector;...

TAGS: Janus vs AFSCME

What Janus v. AFSCME could mean for California

By Jon Coupal
02/23/2018
On Monday, the United States Supreme Court will hear the case of Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31. For California taxpayers, the potential impact is huge. The issue is straightforward: Does public-sector unionism violate the First Amendment rights of workers who do not want to join a union? The...

TAGS: Janus vs AFSCME

After Janus, Will Union Grassroots Members Assert their Political Voice?

By Edward Ring
12/20/2017
The looming Janus vs. AFSCME decision, expected by Spring 2018, is probably going to validate the contention that ALL public sector union activity is inherently political. Once this landmark case is decided, members will not only have the right, already existing, to opt-out of paying political dues. After Janus, they may also have the right...

TAGS: Janus vs AFSCME

How Can Local Officials Prepare for the Upcoming Janus vs AFSCME Ruling?

By Edward Ring
10/18/2017
“A public employer shall provide all public employees an orientation and shall permit the exclusive representative, if applicable, to participate.” – Excerpt from California State Assembly Bill AB 52, December 2016 In plain English, AB 52 requires every local government agency in California to bring union representatives into contact with every new hire, to “allow...

TAGS: Janus vs AFSCME, public sector union reform